Decision on Abu-Jamal’s right to file new appeal in murder conviction must wait
Supporters hope Mumia Abu-Jamal will get a new trial in the murder of Philadelphia police Officer Daniel Faulkner due to what they say is a prosecutorial conflict of interest
![Image uploaded from iOS Supporters of Mumia Abu-Jamal, convicted in the 1981 murder of a Philadelphia police officer, gather Thursday outside the Criminal Justice Center where a judge was considering whether Abu-Jamal’s appeals should be reinstated. (Emma Lee/WHYY)](https://whyy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Image-uploaded-from-iOS-8-768x512.jpg)
Supporters of Mumia Abu-Jamal, convicted in the 1981 murder of a Philadelphia police officer, gather Thursday outside the Criminal Justice Center where a judge was considering whether Abu-Jamal’s appeals should be reinstated. (Emma Lee/WHYY)
A Philadelphia man’s quest to appeal his 1982 murder conviction is on hold for at least another two months.
During a short hearing Thursday, Common Pleas Court Judge Leon Tucker continued the high-profile case, which supporters hope will lead to a new trial for Mumia Abu-Jamal. He is serving a life sentence for the murder of Philadelphia police Officer Daniel Faulkner.
Oral arguments are now scheduled for Oct.29.
Abu-Jamal’s lawyers requested more time to work on the case after learning about a 1988 letter from a former Pennsylvania lawmaker to a former prosecutor who worked under then-Philadelphia District Attorney Ronald Castille.
The document, written on paper with Castille’s letterhead, discusses nearly a dozen death-row cases. Defense attorneys said it appears to be a response to an earlier communication between the two offices – potentially another letter from Castille himself.
“We have lots of questions,” said Judith Ritter, one of Abu-Jamal’s lawyers.
Abu-Jamal’s defense team has long argued the former journalist and Black Panther is entitled to file a new appeal because of a conflict of interest for Castille, who fought Abu-Jamal’s initial appeal while he was the city’s district attorney. Castile later ruled on aspects of Abu-Jamal’s then-death penalty case after he was elected to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
The city’s district attorney’s office disagrees, and it doesn’t expect the newly discovered letter to change Abu-Jamal’s fate.
Castille is “not imputed with knowledge of everything that has his name on it,” said Assistant District Attorney Tracey Kavanagh. “This adds nothing to the analysis.”
WHYY is your source for fact-based, in-depth journalism and information. As a nonprofit organization, we rely on financial support from readers like you. Please give today.