Tough sell for collective bargaining-boosting bills, but unions see hope

In the wake of a Supreme Court decision halting unions’ ability to compel public sector employees to pay fees, pro-union state lawmakers are trying to come up with a rebuttal.

So far, House and Senate Democrats have launched bills that would let public sector workers form unions by simple majorities–an easier system than the one in place now.

Despite a few House Republicans signing on, GOP leaders in the chamber don’t support the measure. A spokeswoman for the Senate said they haven’t reviewed it.

Steve Catanese, president of SEIU Local 668–one of the two biggest unions representing public sector workers in Pennsylvania–said making collective bargaining easier is a long game.

In the meantime, though, he said he’s encouraged by an uptick in people signing on to the union post-Supreme Court ruling.

“We had a few dozen signups, and it was a lot of people who were previously Fair Share,” he said. “Now that that’s not an option they didn’t want to be a free rider, so they felt like hey, I should sign up to do my part.”

The numbers aren’t final, but Catanese said Local 668 has seen at least 100 signups in recent weeks.

Before the Janus ruling, Local 668 and AFSCME–the other major state worker union–were getting about $6.5 million dollars in annual compulsory fees, or so-called Fair Share fees, from almost 19,000 workers.