Last Chance

Donate by midnight to be automatically entered to with an iPhone 11 Pro and to give a meal to a person in need through Philabundance. Both offers end tonight!

Donate now

Wolf rejects Pa. Senate’s infrastructure proposal funded by forest drilling

A drill rig in the Tiadaghton State Forest (Marie Cusick/StateImpact Pennsylvania)

A drill rig in the Tiadaghton State Forest (Marie Cusick/StateImpact Pennsylvania)

This article appeared on PA Post.

After months of Democratic Governor Tom Wolf promoting a sweeping infrastructure plan funded by a tax on natural gas drillers, some Senate Republicans have come up with an alternative.

It would fund a smaller slate of infrastructure improvements by opening up more gas drilling in state forests.

The Senate proposal comes from Republicans Camera Bartolotta and Pat Stefano, of Beaver and Fayette Counties respectively. It hasn’t been formally introduced yet, but an official bill is expected out in the coming days.

Bartolotta and Stefano say they can raise about a billion dollars annually for things like parks and flood control by lifting Wolf’s moratorium on new gas drillers leasing state land.

Pennsylvania’s state forests were once largely wiped out. Now the state manages about 2.2 million forested acres, and a large portion is already open to drillers.

Bartolotta said she doesn’t think more drilling would be invasive, since it’s largely done underground.

“This is in no way putting a drilling rig in the middle of a forest,” she said. “Three miles away, these things can be done. And it’s 6,000 feet underground.”

Conservationists have raised concerns that even non-surface drilling damages habitats and can introduce invasive species, thanks to well pads tamping down soil and roads being carved through the trees.

If passed, Wolf’s plan would raise $4.5 billion.

His spokesman said the Senate plan doesn’t do enough. But so far, his severance tax is a nonstarter among Republicans.

Bartolotta called it unrealistic.

“If you go into a municipality where half of their township has been flooded, yes they’re going to cling to any kind of hope that they have been offered,” she said. “But you know what, you can’t dangle a carrot in front of someone when there isn’t a buffet.”

Likewise, Wolf’s spokesman said Bartolotta and Stefano’s bill doesn’t meet the state Supreme Court’s requirement that any revenue from state forest drilling be routed toward environmental initiatives.

The proposal, he said, “appears to be unconstitutional.”

Bartolotta said she believes the infrastructure initiatives are targeted enough that they would all count as conservatory in nature.


PA Post is a digital-first, citizen-focused news organization that connects Pennsylvanians with accountability and deep-dive reporting.

Want a digest of WHYY’s programs, events & stories? Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

It will take 126,000 members this year for great news and programs to thrive. Help us get to 100% of the goal.