Between several consent agenda items and a few withdrawn applications, today’s Historical Commission Meeting was remarkably brief.
After commissioners reviewed the remaining residential applications for about 15 minutes, Chair Sam Sherman, Jr. turned to a planned discussion on signage decisions as they pertain to historic buildings.
Jonathan Farnham, executive director of the Commission, began by reviewing the relevant standards, then opened the floor to questions and comments from commissioners.
Architectural Committee chair, Dominique Hawkins, citing her experience in drafting design guidelines for cities like New Orleans and Oak Park, IL, conceded that while “signage is a huge issue,” most commercial buildings were designed with places for signs.
She also pointed out that less than five percent — the problem cases –of the signage applications that the staff reviews actually get passed on to commissioners, “which means,” she added, “that the staff is doing a really great job.”
Several other commissioners chimed in with observations on issues of aesthetics and content before Sherman adjourned the meeting.
The Zoning Code Commission resolution today specifically requested that the Planning Commission work on the signs section between now and the effective date of the new code (which is eight months after the date Council finally approves it and Mayor Nutter signs it).
It is possible that modifications to the sign rules will tighten up some sign sizes, locations, etc., in which case the number of sign cases that come before the Historical Commission could decrease, as fewer signs would be offensive to its mandate.
Contact the reporter at firstname.lastname@example.org and follow her on Twitter @joanngreco