Whiffing on Zika: Take a wild guess who’s imperiling babies

    An Aedes aegypti mosquito

    An Aedes aegypti mosquito

    We all know by now that Republicans are well practiced at the art of magical thinking — massive tax cuts balance the budget, human-induced climate change isn’t real, Donald Trump is a normal candidate — but the delusion that tops ’em all is their apparent belief that the Zika virus will slow its pace and take its cues from the ideological cheapskates on Capitol Hill.

    Way back on Feb. 8, President Obama — acting on dire warnings from the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — requested that the Republican Congress pony up nearly $1.9 billion to head off an impending public health emergency. The mosquito-borne Zika virus was nearing American shores and imperiling pregnant women, who, if infected, could give birth to babies with abnormally small heads and severe brain defects. What could be more prudent than to pump sufficient money into preventive mosquito control, vaccine research, and public education?

    Sixteen weeks later, the Republican Congress has passed squat. With no end in sight. It simply refuses to spend the money that health experts know is necessary.

    If congressional Republicans want to screw around in their usual ways — refusing to pass a federal budget, refusing to confirm Obama nominees for key homeland security posts, refusing even to fully staff the U.S. Supreme Court — then maybe, maybe, we can rationalize their standard stasis by pretending that the average citizen isn’t tangibly affected. But come on, people, we’re talking here about the health of American babies. Because the Zika virus is projected to hit the continental U.S. this summer.

    I had long assumed that, for all their hostility to governance, Republicans at minimum believed that protecting American families was paramount. (You know, family values.) I now stand corrected. Apparently, even babies are to be sacrificed on the ideological altar.

    The Republican House wants to give the NIH and CDC only $622 million — roughly one-third of what Obama requested. That money would come from the ’14 kitty that was OK’d to fight the Ebola outbreak (we’re still fighting Ebola, in Africa). The Republican House also says that the $622 million would basically expire in September, and at that point Obama would have to ask for more. Meanwhile, the Republican Senate wants to provide $1.1 billion — roughly half of what Obama requested. It toyed with the idea of financing the Zika fight by taking money out of Obamacare (natch), but it finally passed the bill without doing something that stupid.

    No doubt you’ve spotted the big problem: The Republican House and the Republican Senate are far apart on how many pennies should be pinched, and that stalemate is expected to last well into the summer. That should give the Zika virus more time to infect more people — unless, of course, the virus agrees to abide by the Republican timetable. More than 1,300 cases have already been confirmed; most are pregnant American travelers and citizens of Puerto Rico.

    There are many reasons why Congress is saddled with an 18 percent approval rating. But this Zika farce must surely be one of them.

    Public health experts can’t fathom why Congress is behaving this way. Dr. Peter J. Hotez, at the Baylor College of Medicine, recently said, “I’m very worried, especially for our U.S. Gulf Coast states … It’s like refusing emergency preparedness funds for an approaching hurricane.” Even the GOP-dominated National Governors Association (whose members will have to deal with the disease at ground level), pleaded for Congress to act, warning in a statement this month that “the nation is on the threshold of a public health emergency.”

    Best of all, we have Marco Rubio. It’s amazing how quickly a guy can regain his sanity after escaping the Republican fever swamp.

    Freed of the need to pander, the lame duck senator — mindful of Zika’s threat to Florida — is clanging the alarm. He’s the sole Senate Republican to support the Obama/CDC/NIH money request; in fact, he says it’s probably not enough. He says, “Do we (spend) now before it becomes a crisis, or do we wait for it to become a crisis? … Congress is going to have to explain to the people why it is we sat around and did nothing on something of this magnitude.”

    And let’s not kid ourselves here. The main reason they’ve been sitting around since February is because the request came from Obama. Saving babies is a lower priority than hating Obama.

    And here’s how the hate works in practice:

    Two years ago, in the early days of the Ebola crisis, Republicans said that Obama wasn’t doing enough to keep the disease away from American shores. For instance, Obama allowed an American doctor to treat Ebola patients in West Africa. One Republican idiot tweeted that if the doctor got sick, “Obama should apologize to the American people & resign!” (Naturally, that troll was Donald Trump.)

    Yet today, with Obama doing everything he can to keep Zika away from American shores, vetting the NIH and CDC preventive plans that are reportedly ready to go … nope, Republicans don’t like that, either. And if, as expected, the Zika cases mount after the virus hits here, rest assured they’ll try to blame Obama. 

    But, a la Rubio, a few rare Republicans prefer to be rational. Earlier this month, House member Vern Buchanan — mindful of the virus threatening his Florida district – announced his support for Obama’s money request, and cited medical research which shows that Zika “eats away” at the brain and “destroys the ability to think.”

    Destroys the ability to think … 

    Sounds like a Zika mutation has already infected his colleagues. 

    ——-

    Follow me on Twitter, @dickpolman1, and on Facebook.

     

    Want a digest of WHYY’s programs, events & stories? Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

    It will take 126,000 members this year for great news and programs to thrive. Help us get to 100% of the goal.