Barletta, Casey clash over pre-existing conditions, ACA repeal in Pa.

From the outside, Alfredo’s Pizza & Restaurant is little more than a neon sign on the face of a nondescript shopping center in Scranton. Evergreen shrubs block diners on the patio from a view of shoppers walking into the Dollar Tree next door.

Inside, on a Tuesday evening in October, it was a scene you’d see only during the weeks leading up to an election: Republican U.S. Rep. Lou Barletta in a room packed with supporters as he seeks to unseat Democratic incumbent U.S. Sen. Bob Casey Jr.

“When we finally had a chance to repeal and replace Obamacare, John McCain had voted no, and we lost by one vote,” Barletta said, as the crowd groaned. “And I thought to myself, if I had been there instead of Bob Casey, Obamacare would be gone today.”

Barletta has supported President Donald Trump since before the election, when supporting Trump seemed like a risky longshot to some Republicans. For Barletta, who said a phone call from Trump is what spurred him to run for the Senate, dismantling the Affordable Care Act is one cornerstone of a platform closely allied with the president.

Speaking to the enthusiastic crowd, Barletta focused on those ties as he borrowed Trump’s language.

“Small business confidence is at an all-time high. Consumer confidence is at an all-time high. There are actually more jobs now than people who are unemployed. The economy is so good under Donald Trump now that even Colin Kaepernick found a job.”

The joke landed.

To Barletta, like some of his supporters at Alfredo’s, a conversation about health care is inherently a conversation about costs. Aggregate ACA premiums went up 114 percent since 2014, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Insurance, and Barletta pointed to that.

“Your deductible is so high that people stop going to the doctor. They can’t afford to pay the deductible,” Barletta said during an interview at the event.

Barletta, as he regularly does, spoke to one of the two aspects of the ACA that have made it a complex issue for Republicans and Democrats alike.

On one hand, even some Democrats have shown unease with the cost of the plans, especially since the individual mandate required people to get insurance or pay a tax.

On the other hand, even some Republicans have been uneasy about losing the protection for pre-existing conditions under the ACA.

It’s the second point that has Casey on the offensive.

The two-term senator recently endorsed a political advertisement featuring Stacie Ritter from Manheim, Lancaster County. In the ad, Ritter tells the same story she’s been telling since at least 2010, when she testified to Democratic U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle. Ritter’s twin daughters were diagnosed with cancer when they were 4 years old. In the years since, she’s become an advocate for progressive health care causes.

This time, the two campaigns tangled over the ad. In a response to it on Facebook Live, Barletta said it was a shameful personal attack, coming just months after Barletta learned his 18-month-old grandson, who is also a twin, has cancer. Casey’s campaign had the ad removed from the Scranton media market, near Barletta’s home.

But to Casey’s point: Barletta, along with many other Republicans, did vote to repeal the ACA.

That move that would have nixed protections for pre-existing conditions, although in theory Republicans might have reintroduced those protections as part of the “replace” Obamacare effort.

Casey didn’t immediately have any campaign stops planned, but he was available for a phone interview. He said the vote to repeal the ACA was just the beginning of Republican efforts to return health insurance to the days when an illness could keep people from getting coverage.

“And then the second thing they did was ram through this tax bill, which not only gave the top 1 percent 83 percent of the benefits, and gave big corporations $2 trillion in permanent tax relief, but guess what? It had a cut to health care by getting rid of the individual mandate, thereby ripping away health care for millions of people.”

That move paved the way for Republicans to file a lawsuit in September in federal district court in Texas, Casey said.

“Pennsylvania has 5.3 million people, almost half our population, [who] have a pre-existing condition. If you’re worried about those protections, you should be worried about voting for my opponent or other Republicans, because they are literally, as a political party — it is the official position of the Republican Party that pre-existing conditions do not matter, because they’re all supporting this goddamn lawsuit in Texas.”

That lawsuit, Texas vs. United States, asserts the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional, and therefore should be thrown out.

If the ACA is thrown out, it stands to reason that protections for those with pre-existing conditions will be thrown out as well, said Dan Mallinson, assistant professor of public policy and administration at Penn State Harrisburg, in a telephone interview.

“I think this is why Republicans are a little bit back on their heels recently with this critique, or this campaign issue about specifically preexisting conditions,” Mallinson said.

Initially, Republicans hoped they’d repeal the ACA and replace it with something better, he said. “Then there was tried some efforts to try to just repeal, but if you just repeal, you not only get rid of the things that people don’t like, like the individual mandate, you get rid of other things that people do like, like the pre-existing conditions clause.”

While Republicans don’t want to be on the hook for rolling back protection for pre-existing conditions, Democrats are still dealing with the issue of high premiums and deductibles — a problem they haven’t quite been able to fix, Mallinson said.

“It’s been a difficult environment to actually reform the Affordable Care Act when the position has been that we need to get rid of it,” Mallinson said. “So I don’t know that the Democrats have made a lot of good, strong arguments to reform. They’ve just been sort of fighting the repeal battle.”

Either way, Barletta is fighting his own battle, and despite the energy of supporters in places like Scranton, it’s an uphill one. Casey raised $2.2 million in the third quarter of the 2018 campaign and has $6.7 million available. Barletta also raised $2.2 million that quarter, but has only $1.3 million on hand.

Recent independent polls show Casey more than 15 points ahead.

Mallinson acknowledged that Republican voters may be energized by the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation.

“Three or four weeks is — a lot can happen in politics, so we’ll see if … they can maintain that energy, because there’s certainly a lot of energy on the Democratic side.”