Pa. vote signals support for child sex abuse window in bill form
Many victims lost the right to sue when they turned 18 or were young adults, depending on Pennsylvania state law at the time.
![Clergy Abuse-Pennsylvania Legislature Carolyn Fortney, a survivor of sexual abuse at the hands of her family's Roman Catholic parish priest as a child, awaits legislation in the Pennsylvania Capitol to respond to a landmark state grand jury report on child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2018 in Harrisburg, Pa. (Marc Levy/AP Photo)](https://whyy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/AP_18290797394237-768x512.jpg)
Carolyn Fortney, a survivor of sexual abuse at the hands of her family's Roman Catholic parish priest as a child, awaits legislation in the Pennsylvania Capitol to respond to a landmark state grand jury report on child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2018 in Harrisburg, Pa. (Marc Levy/AP Photo)
The state House of Representatives showed solid support Tuesday for enacting a two-year lawsuit window for child victims of sexual abuse as a regular bill, two weeks after the Legislature gave its first round of approval to a similar constitutional amendment.
The 148 to 53 vote set the table for a final vote in the chamber, and if the House gives its final OK, the state Senate and governor would still need to approve it. The Republican leader’s office said the final vote could occur Wednesday.
The prime sponsor, Rep. Jim Gregory, R-Blair, noted his amendment would allow lawsuits outside the statute of limitations against both public and private entities.
“All public and private defendants are treated the same to ensure that all victims are treated equally,” Gregory said before the successful vote on his amendment.
Nearly all House Democrats voted yes, while the majority Republican caucus was closely divided.
A proposal by Rep. Brett Miller, R-Lancaster, would have delayed implementation of the bill unless and until the constitutional amendment is enacted. Miller said he wanted to “advance the issues of the people” while also defending the constitution’s legal protections for defendants.
It was defeated by a vote of 64-137.
“All this is doing is delaying justice to the survivors of this commonwealth who have waited 15-plus years to be able to go into a civil court of law here and learn the truth,” said Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, a leading advocate of the two-year lawsuit window proposal.
As for the state constitutional amendment, it still needs to be passed by both chambers during the 2023-24 legislative session before going to voters for final approval as a referendum.
The two-track approach — regular legislation and a constitutional amendment — is seen by supporters as a way to provide the lawsuit window sooner through a bill, while the slower constitutional amendment process could provide a sturdier legal foundation against nearly inevitable legal challenges.
Many victims lost the right to sue when they turned 18 or were young adults, depending on Pennsylvania state law at the time.
Early this year, a constitutional amendment had appeared to be on track to probably go before voters in May, but the Department of State failed to advertise it as required, restarting the lengthy process.
The mistake led to the abrupt resignation of Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar. She has described it as an administrative error, and the Wolf administration is investigating.
![](https://whyy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/WHYY-News-logo-2023-square.png)
Get daily updates from WHYY News!
WHYY is your source for fact-based, in-depth journalism and information. As a nonprofit organization, we rely on financial support from readers like you. Please give today.