Will Philly’s proposed land-use law let the sun shine in?

    Preserving sunshine and air is one of many lofty goals for Philadelphia’s new land use laws, which are entering the public-hearing phase. Part One of an eight-part series explores how well that goal is met.

    PlanPhilly.com has launched an eight-part series that seeks to involve residents in the public hearing process around a historic change in the laws governing how and where buildings get built in the city. Part One, below, looks at the basic issue of preserving access to light and air in Philadelphia.


    And we’ll start at the very beginning.

    • WHYY thanks our sponsors — become a WHYY sponsor

    The first purpose that the draft code claims to serve is promoting sound planning principles by “Protecting the access of each property to adequate light, air, street frontage, and other public amenities.” This one seems like a no-brainer. What would a city be like if its buildings didn’t get a fair share of light, air, and access to the street?

    But, said Emanuel Kelly, a ZCC commissioner and principal architect at Kelly/Maiello Architects & Planners, if you look at the oldest sections of Philadelphia, you can see that these things weren’t taken into account when certain neighborhoods were being developed. Places like Port Richmond, Kensington, and parts of South Philadelphia are built out primarily with rowhouses accompanied by tiny yards. These buildings’ only access to light and air is through windows on the front and back of the houses, and it is often minimal.

    These neighborhoods have a desirable character all their own, of course, and the new code wasn’t drafted to change that. So rather than looking to replace what already exists, Kelly said the ZCC asked itself, “How do you improve these standards for new infill units?”

    And the answer is provided in a few sections of the code. The first place to look for specific regulations governing access to light, air, and street frontage is in •14-701 of the draft code: Dimensional Standards. This chapter sets standards for front, side, and rear setbacks, lot area, maximum gross floor area, and height regulations, to name a few. It distinguishes between higher-density and lower-density residential districts as well as between residential, commercial, and industrial. •14-701 also carries a handful of dimensional standard tables, which allow builders to easily check what regulations apply in their districts.

    “The most important thing,” Kelly said, “was to take language that was archaic, in the sense that you have to be a professional to understand it, and make it more user friendly.”

    The tables do just that. For example, if you want to build in a higher-density residential district such as RM-1, you can quickly find out that your lot must be a minimum of 16 feet wide, your building can be a maximum of 38 feet high, and your rear setback must be at least nine feet wide and have an area of no less than 144 square feet. In addition, this chapter notes that a lot must have a street frontage (defined as “The edge of a lot that is contiguous to any publicly dedicated street”) of at least two thirds the minimum lot width required in the given district. For districts that do not have minimum lot widths, street frontage must be “not less than two-thirds of the width of the lot at its widest point.”

    Northern Liberties Neighborhood Association president Matt Ruben said that, from a community perspective, “the new code is meant to prevent overbuilding.” And keeping development reasonably regulated is directly linked to protecting properties’ access to light and air.

    “We want to preserve the livability and character of our neighborhoods,” Ruben said, “and we want to avoid overbuilding. Light and air are the most basic reasons for zoning.”

    Ruben pointed out that while some dimensional regulations have been eased—for example, the maximum height for residential buildings is now 38 feet, up from 35—the decrease in zoning variances will keep development in check. Currently, zoning variances, which are needed for most development, can sometimes allow projects to proceed which are out of step with the neighborhoods surrounding them. A developer can, for example, use a variance to get a residential property rezoned, thereby sidestepping the dimensional requirements of the residential district altogether. The new code should prevent that from happening, for the most part. The tradeoff is that there is slightly more leeway for projects that don’t need variances.

    Ruben pointed out that the standard for normal house size is bigger now than what it was when his and other neighborhoods were built. Thus the increase in maximum height.

    “It’s not a radical increase,” Ruben said, “but it’s a noticeable one.”

    Another component of the reformed code that protects access to light is a section known as the “Sky Plane Control Area,” which covers most of Center City. What’s monitored in this area is essentially how much sky a pedestrian can see when standing in the middle of the street and looking up. This is determined by a computer program which measures how much of the sky plane is blocked by a building or proposed building at various heights above the street. For example, looking up 100 feet from the middle of Arch street in Center City, your view of the sky might be 100% blocked, but looking up 1,000 feet, your view might be 100% unobstructed. Sky plane controls regulate the size and placement of proposed buildings based on this model.

    Joe Schiavo of Old City Civic Association likes this component, but doesn’t feel it goes far enough. The Sky Plane Control Area contains parts of Race, Arch, JFK, Market, Chestnut, Walnut and Locust, west of the Schuylkill River. (For specific boundaries, see •14-502(2)(b)(.20) of the preliminary report). Schiavo pointed out that these are only the East-West streets in Center City, and the North-South streets are exempted.

    “The ZCC came up with a good standard,” Schiavo said, “but why the limited application in the area where sky plane may apply?”

    Though its scope is limited, the Sky Plane Control Area is a concept that gets at the heart of the new code’s first stated purpose, by literally making sure that the light gets in. Without changing the parts of our city that were built hundreds of years ago, the new code aims to guide the development of new projects in ways that protect each property’s access to our public resources. Emanuel Kelly noted that there were differences of opinion among the ZCC regarding how to do that.

    “It took a long time to work out an agreement as to what the adjustments would be,” Kelly said.

    And the process isn’t over yet. Joe Schiavo, for one, believes there’s still time to get the Sky Plane Control Area extended to include Center City’s North-South streets.

    “I honestly don’t see why that can’t yet be changed,” Schiavo said.

    Want a digest of WHYY’s programs, events & stories? Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

    Together we can reach 100% of WHYY’s fiscal year goal