First, participants said they want a superintendent who will invest in the school district’s people and its buildings. That means creating more professional development opportunities for teachers and staff, fixing old buildings, and improving school facilities.
Parents and teachers have raised persistent concerns about unsafe physical conditions in some of the district’s schools, including loose asbestos and mold. Last month, the Philadelphia City Council of Licenses and Inspections committee advanced a bill that would toughen asbestos and mold standards in schools.
“Infrastructure is a leading priority for Philadelphians,” the report reads.
Another main priority is creating an “equitable, non-racist” public education system. One participant called on the next superintendent to visit every school in the district “and ask themselves: ‘What is needed to make this a school that my children can attend?’”
“The next leader should work to balance the scales – not dolling out resources equally across the District; rather, providing resources at a rate that completely fills the gap so that all students are on the same course and all students are able to achieve,” the report reads.
Participants want an anti-racist superintendent who can develop strategies for engaging non-English speaking families, immigrant communities, people with disabilities and “all others that have been pushed to the margins.” They also want a superintendent who understands how violence and trauma show up in the classroom.
Finally, participants said the next leader should strengthen support systems for everyone involved in schools. That includes mental health support for teachers and staff, professional support for nurses, counselors and paraprofessionals, more services for English language learners, and more efforts to address issues like food insecurity, which “undermine student success.”
According to the report, a quarter of people who shared input with the school board were parents or guardians, 23% were teachers, 18% were district employees, and 11% were students. Community members, members of the business community, and clergy rounded out the list of the participants.
About 41% were white, 39% were African American, 7% were Hispanic/Latinx, 6% were Asian American, Pacific Islander, and 4% were multi-racial.