Board approves $4.1 million Penn investment in Lea Elementary
Also Thursday night, the board approved a measure that will allow the University of Pennsylvania to pump more than $4 million into Henry C. Lea Elementary School over the next five years.
The district will enter into a memorandum of agreement with Penn, which will direct about $800,000 per year to the K-8 school in West Philadelphia.
Penn already partners with Penn Alexander, another elementary school near its University City campus, providing the school with about $1,300 per student.
Bolstered by that extra support, Penn Alexander is a high-performing neighborhood school that has twice been named a National Blue Ribbon School of Excellence by the U.S. Department of Education.
Penn, the School District of Philadelphia, and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers wish to “emulate the success of the Penn Alexander School,” by investing in Lea, according to board documents.
The goal is to “bring greater innovation and flexibility to school operations,” improve instruction and school culture, and become a “vigorous clinical setting” for teacher development.
News of the proposed partnership sparked some concern that longtime residents of the Lea catchment area — which includes the historically Black neighborhoods of Walnut Hill and Cedar Park — could be priced out of their homes, as the school becomes more desirable and wealthier families move into the catchment area, driving up real estate values.
“This investment will encourage more gentrification of the neighborhood and will most certainly displace lower income families who attend this school,” Kristin Luebbert, a district teacher, said at the board meeting.
The median home price in the Penn Alexander catchment area has skyrocketed in the years since the elementary school was founded, from $171,000 in September 2000 — a year before the school opened — to more than $720,000 by the end of 2021, WHYY reported.
In comparison, the median home price in the Lea catchment is currently under $170,000.
The pricier Penn Alexander catchment area is also whiter and higher income than the Lea zone. 45% of students are white, 26% Asian, 14% Black, and 4% Hispanic. Less than half of the students come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.
In the Lea catchment, 65% of students identify as Black, 13% as white, 12% Asian, and 5% Hispanic. Three quarters of the students come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.
At the board meeting, several Lea parents expressed concern about the partnership.
Phil Gentry, the father of two Lea students, said the deal was “negotiated behind the back of those of us who live in the neighborhood and send our children to our neighborhood school.”
“Like every school in the district, we need more resources and can’t afford to turn down any support,” he said. “But what sort of relationship is it where a community can’t afford to say no?”
Gentry worries about how the investment will transform the Lea catchment zone.
“Letting wealthy private institutions choose which students in Philadelphia get a quality education undermines us all,” he said.
Some education advocates have pushed Penn to make payments in lieu of taxes (PILOTs), to support the district as a whole rather than hand-selecting schools for heavy investment — something other Ivy League schools like Harvard and Yale already do.
Abby Reisman, whose child will start school at Lea this fall, submitted written testimony in strong support of the partnership.
“As a parent, I am excited about what this agreement will mean in terms of increased support for teachers, additional staffing, and educational services for students,” wrote Reisman, who is also a faculty member of Penn’s Graduate School of Education.
“As a teacher educator and former classroom teacher, I’m excited about what this partnership could mean for the preparation of future teachers, who are hungry for models of community-based schools that engage in project-based learning,” she continued.
Reisman wrote that the past few years have laid bare both the crises of school underfunding and the burdens that teachers and school leaders shoulder.
“Especially in this context, I find it difficult to understand how anyone could oppose this proposal for this school, while continuing to fight for equitable school funding more broadly,” she said.