On the stand, Hite described a district still feeling the effects of staffing cuts made nearly a decade ago.
When he took over as superintendent in 2012, the district was in financial distress, Hite said, partly because of cuts to state education funding.
His administration closed 24 schools and cut about 4,000 positions, reducing the district’s workforce by 20%.
That included school psychologists, guidance counselors, bilingual counselors, and construction managers.
“We still haven’t returned to the staffing, the levels, that we had prior to all of those cuts,” Hite said.
Now, he said, school leaders have to make trade-offs. A school might need a counselor, a reading specialist, and someone to help with behavior issues stemming from student trauma, but only have enough money for one position.
“They have to prioritize and say which one of these will have the greatest impact, and then I’ll just choose to do without the others — although I need the others,” Hite said.
Just six of the district’s more than 200 campuses have certified librarians, one stark example of how underfunding shows up in schools.
These trade-offs affect students’ ability to succeed in school and to graduate career and college ready, Hite said.
He pointed to the district’s growing number of English language learners. In the 2012-2013 school year, about 8% of students, or 11,502 children, were English language learners. By the 2019-2020 school year, that number had grown to 13%, or 16,669.
The state expects students to reach English proficiency in six years. About half of the district’s youngest students met that growth target in the 2018-2019 school year, and only 15% of students in grades 6-12 met the target, according to a research brief prepared by the district.
Those numbers are not acceptable, Hite said.
“Learning the language is one of the first steps in order to have access to many opportunities that we would want those young people to have,” he added, including graduating from high school, getting a job, or enrolling in college.
With more funding, the district could hire more support staff for English language learners, and more bilingual counselor assistants to help their families.
“It’s been my experience, particularly here in Philadelphia and in other districts where I’ve worked, that where we’ve had those types of supports, children do a much better job reaching the levels of language acquisition that allow them to exit [English as a second language] services,” Hite said.
It was just one of many examples Hite laid out, illustrating how more funding and resources could improve educational outcomes for Philadelphia students.
During cross-examination, John Krill, a lawyer for GOP Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, sought to undermine the dire picture painted by Hite.
He asked him to read through a document, created by the district, encouraging families to enroll in its schools. The document lays out “the top 10 reasons to choose the School District of Philadelphia” from its commitment to early literacy — “we’ve trained all of our K-3 teachers to become expert reading instructors” — to its focus on career and college readiness — “we offer 35 rigorous Advanced Placement courses.”
Throughout the trial, defense attorneys have pointed to high-level course offerings, special programs, and student achievements (like an award-winning sports team at the William Penn School District) to argue that districts are able to provide students with solid opportunities at their current funding levels, and are often not only meeting but exceeding their constitutional mandate.
Hite’s cross-examination will pick back up later this week. The trial is expected to continue well into February.