Sitting outside a bakery in Narberth Wednesday, Richard Gelber of Wynnewood watched a bag blow down the street and said he thinks bans are more effective than fees.
“I actually think plastic bag bans are a great idea because I’m a paddler, and you see fish, you see frogs wrapped up in plastic bags in otherwise beautiful parks,” Gelber said. “Is it awkward or difficult because I often forget to bring a reusable bag myself? Yeah.”
Tracy Tumolo, owner of Sweet Mable gift store in Narberth, said she supports restrictions on plastic bags and has always provided reusable or recycled bags. But she worries the pandemic was a setback to reducing plastic use.
“Once COVID struck, things started slipping away,” Tumulo said.
Lower Merion joined the municipalities’ lawsuit because preemption would prevent the township from enacting a ban on single-use plastics.
Last summer, lawmakers extended a 2019 moratorium on plastic bag bans by inserting it into the fiscal code (HB1083) just hours before a full vote, with little debate and no public hearing.
The measure was tucked between parts of an amendment on how to spend state gambling proceeds. It prohibited municipalities from enacting any fees or restrictions on all single-use plastics such as bags, utensils, or styrofoam containers. Lawmakers said they needed to study the impact of such bans.
But since then, concerns over plastics have risen, and many Democratic lawmakers who once may have supported the measure are either out of office or have shifted their stance.
While environmentalists are cheering the disappearance of the ban on bag bans in this year’s budget, some are still cautious.
“I think we should always be concerned when it comes to policies that are not in the public interest but where polluters have a financial stake in the outcome,” said PennEnvironment’s David Masur. “They can rear their ugly head at any time and any given year.”