A jury deliberating over 18 charges at the bribery trial of Sen. Bob Menendez in New York City asked the judge on Monday if unanimity is required to acquit “on a single count.” Hours later they recessed for the day without reaching a verdict.
The jurors sent the note after resuming discussions Monday morning in Manhattan federal court, following their first three hours of deliberations on Friday. The corruption trial for the New Jersey Democrat is in its 10th week.
Their written note asked: “Does a not guilty verdict on a single count require unanimity?”
After consulting with lawyers in the case, Judge Sidney H. Stein responded: “Jury, your vote — whether guilty or not guilty — must be unanimous as to each count and to each defendant.”
After lunch, jurors sent another note asking for clarification on one of the counts and lawyers and the judge took over an hour to prepare a response.
Jury deliberations were to resume Tuesday morning.
Menendez is charged in 16 of 18 counts in an indictment first returned last fall.
As he left the courthouse Monday and walked to a waiting car, Menendez turned briefly toward reporters and news cameras and said: “It’s obvious that the government’s case is not as simple as they made it to be. It’s not as simple as they made it to be. The jury’s finding that out.”
Menendez, 70, has denied charges that he engaged in a bribery scheme from 2018 to 2023 to benefit three New Jersey businessmen, including by serving as a foreign agent for the government of Egypt.
He and two businessmen who allegedly paid him bribes of gold and cash have pleaded not guilty.
As he left the courthouse on Friday, Menendez told reporters, “I have faith in God and in the jury.”