One unique aspect of the Yale research includes tracing potential drinking water exposure.
“It really is a superb study,” said Dr. Bernard Goldstein, former dean of the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health and an expert in environmental causes of childhood leukemia. Goldstein is not associated with this study. He has conducted prior research into exposures due to oil and gas wastewater in Pennsylvania. “It looks at a potential problem in ways that include new exposure metrics, which are really needed.”
Goldstein says that though the factors that contribute to childhood leukemia are complex and still unclear, benzene is the one known link.
The interdisciplinary team of researchers included experts on leukemia and environmental science, as well as hydrogeologists. In addition to the location of well sites, researchers mapped individual watersheds and determined the flow of water from well heads to the children’s homes. They did not survey the families to determine individual sources of drinking water. Still, they say the research shows that a child living within 1.2 miles of a well site, which is within their watershed, could be at a higher risk of exposure through drinking water.
Previous research has shown an association between fracking activities and health impacts, but determining the path to exposure is more difficult.
“I think we have about 50 epidemiological health studies demonstrating increased adverse health outcomes in communities that live near unconventional oil and gas sites,” said Dr. Nicole Deziel, a co-author of the study and associate professor at the Yale School of Public Health in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences. “I think it would be very important to understand which exposures or hazards might be driving these associations.”
Deziel says she wants the study to impact public policy, including regulations on residential setbacks from wellheads and the density of drilling sites. Pennsylvania requires a 500-foot setback from schools and homes. Deziel says it should be 1,000 meters, especially since her findings show greater impacts for those children exposed in utero.
“We saw some stronger associations when we restricted that time window to children who had an exposure in utero,” she said, “suggesting that that may be a sensitive time window, which is also consistent with some other studies of other environmental exposures.”