‘We all feel at risk’: 100,000 people dead from COVID-19 in the U.S.
The U.S. death toll from COVID-19 has reached a somber milestone: as of Wednesday afternoon, the highly infectious viral disease has taken more than 100,000 lives nationwide.
Soaring from two known coronavirus fatalities in February to more than 58,000 in April, the tally of U.S. deaths — in a country with fewer than 5% of the world’s inhabitants — now accounts for nearly one-third of all the known lives lost worldwide to the pandemic.
According to a mortality analysis by Johns Hopkins University’s Coronavirus Resource Center, about 6% of the nearly 1.7 million people who have tested positive for COVID-19 in the U.S. have now succumbed to the disease.
Public health experts say the coronavirus has exposed the vulnerability of a wide range of Americans and the shortcomings of a U.S. health care system faced with a deadly pandemic.
“What is different about this is, it is affecting all of us in a variety of ways, even if some of us are able to social distance in more effective ways than others,” says sociology professor Kathleen Cagney, who directs The University of Chicago’s Population Research Center. “But we all feel at risk.”
Even some who are well acquainted with earlier health scourges in the U.S. were caught off guard by this one.
“I think anybody who understands anything about infectious disease recognizes that we were going to sooner or later face something like this,” said John Barry, a professor at Tulane University School of Public Health And Tropical Medicine and author of “The Great Influenza: The Story Of The Deadliest Pandemic In History,” on NPR’s Fresh Air earlier this month. “But, you know, intellectually understanding it is one thing, and having it hit you is something quite different.”
Demographic disparities in deaths
People have died from the disease in all 50 states and most U.S. territories. But the impact has been felt unevenly. Demographic statistics that the CDC has posted of the first nearly 69,000 fatalities show some striking disparities:
— The disease has been far deadlier for males than females. For age groups up to 75 years old, about twice as many men and boys have been killed by COVID-19 as have women and girls.
— Older people have died in much greater numbers than those who are younger. Eighty percent of the known fatalities were at least 65 years old.
— Racial and ethnic disparities in who is dying have also become apparent, even while tracking data that has been compiled by Johns Hopkins is still incomplete.
In Alabama, for example, 44% of those killed by COVID-19 were black, in a state where fewer than 27% of its residents are African American. Similarly, while African Americans make up 14% of Michigan’s population, they account for 40% of that state’s COVID-19 fatalities.
Native American communities have also been hit especially hard by the pandemic. In Arizona, Native Americans account for about 5% of the population but comprise nearly 17% of that state’s COVID-19 fatalities.
The University of Chicago’s Cagney said that differences in socioeconomic status — and thus the ability to practice social distancing — are contributing to COVID-19’s uneven lethal impact.
“If you look at the locations where people are disproportionately dying, they are in places that are lower income,” said Cagney. “They are places that likely have multiple residents in a single unit space. They are places where people rely on public transit and rely on services like big box locations where by entry alone you’re putting yourself at risk.”
The degree of devastation wrought by the pathogen has taken even some public health experts by surprise.
“Back in March, I did not think this would be possible — I was not expecting 100,000 deaths,” said Christopher Murray, director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.
“I really believed we as a nation would have taken the decision to put in place social distancing and accepted the economic hardship that it’s creating, and that we would have stuck to it to get transmission down to a very low level,” he added.
A study done this month by a Columbia University research team suggests the number of coronavirus deaths in the U.S. could have been considerably lower had Americans been told sooner to stay home and maintain social distancing.
A “pre-print” version of the report — meaning it has yet to be peer reviewed — finds that “55% of reported deaths as of May 3, 2020 could have been avoided if the same control measures had been implemented just one week earlier.”
By that measure, the nationwide death toll on that date of 65,307 could have instead stood at 29,410 — meaning nearly 36,000 lives might have been saved.
“The lesson isn’t what this means for the next time we have a pandemic with a new virus,” says Jeffrey Shaman, one of the study’s co-authors. “The lesson is really what are we doing with this virus as we move forward that it isn’t going anywhere and that we still have to contend with it.”
Asked on Thursday about the Columbia University study, President Trump dismissed it as “just a political hit job.”
A roller coaster ride of presidential predictions
The number of Americans killed by the pandemic appears to be a sensitive subject for a president seeking reelection in November. His predictions have gone up and down several times.
“We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China,” Trump told CNBC on Jan. 22, one day after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed the first COVID-19 case in the U.S. “We have it under control. It’s going to be just fine.”
Five weeks later, on Feb. 27 — almost a month after the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a “public health emergency of international concern” — Trump continued to downplay the threat posed by the coronavirus.
“You have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero,” Trump declared at a White House coronavirus task force briefing. “That’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”
But the numbers kept rising. By the end of March, with the WHO having already declared a global pandemic, Johns Hopkins was reporting more than 188,000 confirmed coronavirus infections in the U.S. and some 5,500 deaths.
That was when Trump executed an abrupt U-turn in his effort to manage public expectations: for the first time, he broached the possibility that the pandemic — far from nearing zero — could indeed end up claiming 100,000 U.S. lives.
Speaking from the White House Rose Garden on March 29, Trump cited new mortality projections by Dr. Deborah Birx, response coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The two had predicted that if no preventive measures were taken, the pandemic could cause 2.2 million deaths in the U.S.; if such measures were taken, the toll could be between 100,000 and 200,000 deaths over an unspecified period of time.
“And so, if we can hold that down, as we’re saying, to 100,000 — that’s a horrible number — maybe even less, but to 100,000,” Trump said, “so we have between 100- and 200,000 — we all, together, have done a very good job.”
Three weeks later, amid mounting pressure from supporters to reopen the mostly quarantined economy, Trump was back to lowering public expectations about how many lives the pandemic might claim.
“One is too many. But we’re going toward 50- or 60,000 people,” Trump declared on April 20. “That’s at the lower — as you know, the low number was supposed to be 100,000 people. We — we could end up at 50 to 60.”
Trump appeared to be relying on one of the lowest of a dozen fatality estimates at the time, a range of 60,000 to 115,000 deaths modeled by the University of Washington’s IHME.
But a week later, with social distancing measures being eased, the IHME practically doubled those projected numbers, forecasting that nearly 135,000 — and possibly as many as 242,890 — people would die by August in the U.S. from COVID-19.
IHME’s Murray says the earlier calculations had been made assuming every state would hold off on loosening social distancing measures until new infections had dropped to a very low level.
“But even before people started relaxing the mandates, people start changing their behavior as the national discussion about reopening the economy became pretty dominant,” says Murray, adding that his team realized keeping those mandates in place until early June “was just not going to happen. And so that’s what led to our major change in the modeling’s strategy and assumptions.”
Trump, for his part, once again raised his predictions about how many lives in the U.S. the pandemic would claim.
“I used to say 65,000,” he declared May 3 during a Fox News interview held at the Lincoln Memorial. “And now I’m saying 80 or 90, and it goes up and it goes up rapidly. But it’s still going to be, no matter how you look at it, at the very lower end of the plane.”
By mid-May, all of the dozen forecasting models for COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. tracked by the CDC surpassed Trump’s latest predictions.
“All forecast an increase in deaths in the coming weeks,” CDC Director Robert Redfield, in his first public comment on expected deaths, tweeted on May 15. Every one of those models, he added, predicted “a cumulative total exceeding 100,000 by June 1.”
Many more deaths expected — and funerals
With all 50 states now separately dropping some or all of their social distancing restrictions, health experts warn that the U.S. coronavirus death toll could climb much higher than the approximately 140,000 by August that many of them have been predicting.
“Now we’re almost getting the worst of both worlds — we’re getting the economic hardship and we’re relaxing,” said the IHME’s Murray. “And it seems either now or in the fall, we’re going to have a big second wave and we’ll be right back to dealing with pressure on the hospital system and dealing with, when is the peak surge coming?”
Columbia University’s Shaman said the U.S. has to keep suppressing the spread of COVID-19 while having an acceptable level of a functioning economy.
“That’s the hard problem we’re trying to address as we try to figure that out and we loosen restrictions,” said Shaman. “If we have these flare-ups, we have to be willing to immediately recognize them and tamp back down and not wait and not dither. And that goes both for communities that have experienced the virus already and those that have not experienced it as much.”
And there’s another challenge: Many of the 100,000 who have died have not yet had proper send-offs.
“It’s been stunning to me that we have had as much death as we’ve had, with as little attention to all those deaths,” said Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute. “I think one of the reasons we’ve had so little attention to all of this is because we’ve not had the kind of public mourning that comes with mass casualties like this.”
Jha expects that as the U.S. opens up from its social isolation, those who have grieved privately will be holding postponed funerals, burials and other commemorations.
“I think the sort of the weight of this calamity is going to become much more apparent to people in the upcoming days and weeks,” Jha added. “So people are going to, I think, really come to grips with how awful these last couple of months have been.”