The pitch for a PA single-payer system
Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
By: Taunya English
tenglish@whyy.org
Advocates for a single-payer health care system got a long-awaited hearing at the Pennsylvania Capitol Wednesday. WHYY reports on the bid to side-step the private insurance industry and create a new way to pay for health care across the Commonwealth.
Listen:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Supporters want to establish a government-run health care trust fund. They say everyone in Pennsylvania could get their care paid for, if the state collected a 3 percent income tax from individuals, and a 10 percent payroll tax from business. Chuck Pennacchio leads Healthcare for All Pennsylvania.
Pennacchio: This is the time now to shift the discussion over to the state level, this is really about federalism, it's about getting the states the opportunity to model a doable plan, and single-payer Senate Bill 400 is the ultimate answer.
Groups representing Pennsylvania doctors, the insurance industry and small business oppose the plan. Kevin Shivers is the Pennsylvania director for the National Federation of Independent Business.
Shivers: The single payer health care system doesn't do what needs to be done about cost.
Senate Banking Committee Chair, Republican Don White, warned that any fundamental changes at the state level would likely be made irrelevant by coming national reforms. Proponents of the single payer system have been trying to move a bill ahead for several years.
Kevin Shivers: Creating a new government bureaucracy, that's going to include benefit plans that are clearly politicized because they are going to be created by the government, isn't actually going to be reducing the cost, in fact we think, like every other program run by the government, it's just going to balloon and cost more in the future.
Single-payer supporters say putting the government in charge of all health care expenses in Pennsylvania would save millions of dollars in insurance administration costs.
Pittsburgh state Senator Jim Ferlo sponsored the legislation. He says it was a coup to get the bill considered before the Republican-controlled Senate Banking committee.
Ferlo: Even those who were may be not sympathetic to a single-payer, Medicare for All, plan recognize the tremendous support this legislation has around the state and want to at least be respectful to their constituents who do support it. Yes it's a movement in progress, it's a works in progress.
Senator Don White said the hearing was only a fact-finding mission noted that the political realities in Pennsylvania make a single-payer system a tough sell.


I vote "yes."
Jeffrey, if you were my doctor, YOU would get to decide the best treatment for my health and you would be reimbursed from the trust fund. You don't have to check with the insurance company first or base your treatment on what has the best reimbursement rate.
You're a "member of the healthcare industry"? I'd love some specifics on what you practice. No docs I know think working with multiple insurance company bureaucracies with profit motives is better than a single non-profit gov't entity.
I can understand why a doctor is vey happy with insurance companies. They have a very cozy relationship for years!! We are discussing the good for common people. Not the upper class people.
A single payer health care system is the most efficient means of delivering health care to everyone without the drawbacks of for profit insurance companies. The insurers and other act all butt hurt, because their prices will have to come down to compete.
The insurance companies have had decades to reform themselves voluntarily and they chose not to because it didn't make enough money honestly. Why would anyone vote to let the same people administer their health insurance policies when their intent is known.
There are many ways to make money in a capitalist system other than intentionally confusing and misleading consumers about something as important as health care. The current system may be wonderful for millionaires, but for the middle class and working poor not so much.
well said!!!
I have to type this line because the website said my comment was too short. so again..
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
well said,
As a member of the health-care industry for 30 years, I must say this is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever read. Why not take a vote among Pa residents and see how they feel about paying 3%-13% more in taxes to have the government run their health-care.
Sorry…Why not focus on preventative services and tax credits for HSAs? Oh. I know why. Because you won't get collect more taxes.