<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WEB CHAT: Searching for what works in medicine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whyy.org/cms/news/health-science/2009/09/15/web-chat-searching-for-what-works-in-medicine/17824/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whyy.org/cms/news/health-science/2009/09/15/web-chat-searching-for-what-works-in-medicine/17824</link>
	<description>News and Information from WHYY in Philadelphia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:54:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://whyy.org/cms/news/health-science/2009/09/15/web-chat-searching-for-what-works-in-medicine/17824/comment-page-1#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyy.org/cms/news/?p=17824#comment-675</guid>
		<description>The story this morning did not address if or how health insurance companies use comparative effectiveness research, or some similar process for deciding which treatments to cover. I&#039;ve heard many anecdotal stories of insurance companies refusing to cover certain treatments in spite of doctor recommendations. This is a particularly important point in light of the Conservative for Patients&#039; Rights spokesperson&#039;s comment about how terrible public-provided coverage is because it will (according to her) lead to the use of CER. But aren&#039;t most of us already subject to some version of this approach to treatment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story this morning did not address if or how health insurance companies use comparative effectiveness research, or some similar process for deciding which treatments to cover. I&#039;ve heard many anecdotal stories of insurance companies refusing to cover certain treatments in spite of doctor recommendations. This is a particularly important point in light of the Conservative for Patients&#039; Rights spokesperson&#039;s comment about how terrible public-provided coverage is because it will (according to her) lead to the use of CER. But aren&#039;t most of us already subject to some version of this approach to treatment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare reform &#124; WHYY News and Information &#124; WHYY</title>
		<link>http://whyy.org/cms/news/health-science/2009/09/15/web-chat-searching-for-what-works-in-medicine/17824/comment-page-1#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare reform &#124; WHYY News and Information &#124; WHYY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyy.org/cms/news/?p=17824#comment-673</guid>
		<description>[...]  WEB CHAT: Searching for what works in medicine Taunya English &#8211; September 15, 2009 There has been much discussion and controversy about comparative effectiveness research and it&#039;s role in healthcare reform. Join us for a live discussion on comparative effectiveness research and ask the experts your questions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  WEB CHAT: Searching for what works in medicine Taunya English &#8211; September 15, 2009 There has been much discussion and controversy about comparative effectiveness research and it&#39;s role in healthcare reform. Join us for a live discussion on comparative effectiveness research and ask the experts your questions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

