Health and Science banner

Putting a price on organ donation

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009



Organ trafficking allegations in New Jersey this summer cast a new spotlight on the debate over the best ways to get more people to donate legally. Last year more than 4,500 people in the US died waiting for a kidney, and all sides acknowledge that the need for organs overwhelms the supply. Beyond that, disagreements flare up about which incentives are ethical and practical. (Photo: Gray's Anatomy)

Listen:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Kidneys are in high demand. Tens of thousand of patients spend years tethered to dialysis, waiting for a transplant. In 2007, the government spent more than $8 billion on dialysis treatments and medication. Economist Alex Tabarrok says it'd be cheaper to share some of that money with willing donors.

Tabarrok: So if we could pay $15,000, increase the number of transplants, reduce the amount of dialysis, we could actually save lives, improve lives and save money at the same time.

Tabarrok is a research director at George Mason University.

Tabarrok: There's some feelings that this type of market is repugnant. So people just feel … 'Ugh, I don't think we should be selling organs.'

Others say paying for organs will push poor people into an unwanted surgery. But policy analyst Sally Satel says offering deferred, non-cash incentives such as retirement contributions or tax credits would persuade more people to donate and eliminate the concerns over exploiting donors.

Satel: The way to protect against something like that, is not to offer what desperate people want, which is cash immediately.

In 1994, Pennsylvania approved a pilot program to offer money for funeral costs. But some state officials worried the payments would violate the federal ban on the sale of human organs. The program never got off the ground.

Last year Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter floated a draft bill that could have cleared the way for states to offer non-cash incentives. Analyst Sally Satel, who got a kidney from a friend in 2006, loved that idea.

Satel: It's a clarification that it is not a felony for a third party to reward donors, that's it. It would mean that the widow in Harrisburg who accepts a $3,000 funeral benefit wouldn't go to prison.

But groups including the National Kidney Foundation rejected Specter's proposal, now a spokeswoman for the Senator says he has no plans to introduce the bill.

Boston transplant surgeon Francis Delmonico says donors should receive compensation for their altruism, but not profit from their gift. He favors government guarantees for loss wages, child care and travel expenses.

Delmonico: Making certain that they are not at a loss of out-of-pocket expenses, making certain that they are well cared for by having insurance. Ninety percent of the transplant people across this country want to see that happen.

Ohio resident Donna Lubeke donated a kidney to her sister 15 years ago. These days, she helps to run the Living Donor Advocate Program.

Lubeke: If a donor needs to have a re-operation, or re-admission, or suffers a life-long complication as a result of the kidney donation, who's responsible for that? That's our big issue.

The advocate program is helping a man who recently developed high blood pressure and kidney disease. He's paying for his own medical expenses out-of-pocket because his health insurance company says his elective organ donation years ago caused his current medical problems.

Lubeke says other donors don't even have health insurance.

Lubeke: These are people that can't even access health care for a broken arm, and you take a kidney from them. They say: 'Well the recipient's insurance pays for everything.' They don't pay for lifelong monitoring of their renal function.

As a nurse, Lubeke gets annual check-ups to track the health of her remaining kidney, she wants health insurance reforms to make sure all donors have access to long-term, follow-up care.

Lubeke: You live the rest of your life with reduced kidney function you don't grow back kidney tissue when they've taken 50 percent of it.

Lubeke says the transplant system needs to do more to care for people who've already come forward before handing out valuable perks to lure other donors.

The World Health Organization is studying the pros and cons of offering incentives in exchange for organs. The advisory group makes its recommendations in October, and members say the group will likely reject the idea.

The United Network for Organ Sharing tracks the number of patients waiting on the transplant list.

VN:F [1.9.10_1130]
Rate this story:
Rating: 3.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Putting a price on organ donation, 3.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

3 Comments

  • Donate-For-Life Organ Donor Program is "…the best comprehensive SOLUTION to end the severe shortage for all organs."

    Website: http://www.donate-for-life.com

    VA:F [1.9.10_1130]
    0
  • Mark says:

    If you live in a state that has adopted the 2006 Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, it is presumed that you are an organ donor unless they can find information contrary to their assumptions. This change was made expressly to increase the supply of organs, tissue and body parts so that the $20 Billion in annual revenues for organ related medical services could keep growing.

    Brain death and donation after cardiac arrest for as little as 75 seconds is becoming the standard in hospitals to start the organ harvesting process.

    Removing your name from any list or erasing your consent from your driver's license means absolutely nothing under the 2006 version of the act.

    Even if you have a written Advance Healthcare Directive that forbids the use of machines to keep your body alive, they can do so as long as they are talking to your family to give consent to start the organ harvesting procedure.

    If you don't express a preference on organ harvesting, your family has to make the decision. Organ Procurement Organizations and Tissue Banks have to follow your instructions if you register your preferences with a known donor registry.

    Unfortunately, no state that has adopted the 2006 UAGA has a state donor registry that allows you to register as a "no" or allows donation on condition of just compensation to your family or estate.

    If you are one of the estimated 10% of Americans who does not support organ harvesting, you can register your objection and explore your options under the law at http://www.DoNotTransplant.com.

    VA:F [1.9.10_1130]
    0
  • Dave Undis says:

    There is an already-legal incentive that can put a big dent in the organ shortage — allocate donated organs first to people who have agreed to donate their own organs when they die. UNOS, which manages the national organ allocation system, has the power to make this simple policy change. No legislative action is required.

    Americans who want to donate their organs to other registered organ donors don't have to wait for UNOS to act. They can join LifeSharers, a non-profit network of organ donors who agree to offer their organs first to other organ donors when they die. Membership is free at http://www.lifesharers.org or by calling 1-888-ORGAN88. There is no age limit, parents can enroll their minor children, and no one is excluded due to any pre-existing medical condition.

    Giving organs first to organ donors will convince more people to register as organ donors. It will also make the organ allocation system fairer. Non-donors should go to the back of the waiting list as long as there is a shortage of organs.

    VA:F [1.9.10_1130]
    0
spacer image