Fumo Lawyers Seek Removal of Juror Over Internet Postings
Monday, March 16th, 2009 at 7:12 am - by Matt Campbell. Filed under: Courts.
The lawyers for former Pennsylvania State Senator Vince Fumo are calling for a mistrial because they claim a juror has been posting jury deliberation updates on the social networking sites Twitter and Facebook.
Attorneys NiaLena Caravasos and Peter Goldberger filed a motion yesterday seeking the removal of the juror or the declaration of a mistrial because a juror allegedly has posted several updates including on Facebook ”Stay tuned for a big announcement on Monday everyone!” and on Twitter ”This is it . . . no looking back now.” A hearing is scheduled for later this morning.
Here’s part of what the Philadelphia Inquirer is reporting this morning.
The petition, filed on the eve of the scheduled sixth day of deliberations in Fumo’s federal corruption trial, stated that there was “substantial evidence” that the juror, who was not identified, had violated admonitions not to disclose the status of deliberations.
The lawyers asked U.S. District Judge Ronald L. Buckwalter to question the juror and other members of the panel.
“An immediate suspension of deliberations and a delicate but probing judicial inquiry is warranted,” lawyers NiaLena Caravasos and Peter Goldberger stated in the petition. “Depending on the results of that inquiry, it seems that one or more jurors ought to be removed and possibly replaced . . . or that a mistrial will be required.”
What do you think? Should the juror be removed? Is this enough for a mistrial?
It's Our City is a project that uses TV, Radio and Web
to promote civic engagement in the Philadelphia region.

March 16th, 2009 at 9:52 am
The juror is an idiot. I’ve been on a jury and they make it very clear that you are to discuss the case with no one. That being said, the comments made are very vague so it would be surprising to see it called a mistrial. A removal of the juror would probably be fair however. My hope is that neither happens and they just wrap this up.
March 16th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
I’m guessing that juror doesn’t “get it”. Why would you even think of posting something about the case on FB or Twitter?! Yes the comments were vague but come on.
Not like it matter’s now, he was found guilty.
March 27th, 2009 at 3:35 am
[...] View the entire post by clicking here [...]