It's Our City Home


News and Information Home

 


Hot Topics


Give you thoughts on these current debates:


Philly's "S.S. United States" Ocean Liner May End Up as Scrap Metal »


Philly to bicyclists: Get off the sidewalk »


Is the Philadelphia Parking Authority scaring away tourists? »


 


Mayor's 2010 Budget


Full Coverage »


 


Budget Workshops


Full Coverage »


 


Blogroll


Philly Clout


Heard in City Hall


It's Our Money


More »


 


Mission Statement


It's Our City is a project that uses TV, Radio and Web to promote civic engagement in the Philadelphia region.


 


About Us


Contact Us


Useful Resources


 



First they came for the newspapers…

Monday, March 2nd, 2009 at 3:39 pm - by Dan Pohlig. Filed under: Community.

…and I said nothing because I wasn’t a newspaper.

Well, the trouble that the newspapers are in today could be visited upon the television stations tomorrow.  In Saturday’s New York Times, several network executives mull over this possibility, including NBC’s Jeff Zucker:

Jeff Zucker, the chief of NBC Universal, has been more pessimistic, saying, “broadcast television is in a time of tremendous transition, and if we don’t attempt to change the model now, we could be in danger of becoming the automobile industry or the newspaper industry.”

On the local level, this could mean similar trouble for the local affiliates who also depend so much on advertising that is being seen by fewer and fewer eyeballs.  Not traditionally thought of as the paragon of investigative news outlets, any cuts to the already spartan budgets of the local television news operations could continue to erode our ability to keep a close eye on the comings and goings of municipal and county governments throughout the region.  (One of my colleagues made the point that we - and when I say we, I refer to the region’s entire media establishment - are already missing a lot of what’s going on in suburban governments which are often just as corrupt or mismanaged as the city - if not more.)

Solutions?

It’s clear that what the internet has wrought, the internet should also fix.  Since the internet traffics in text, audio and video, it will be the place for all of the media companies in this region, including the public media, to find a solution.  Your recommended reading when it comes to other bloggers who have been putting a lot of thought into this include Mark Potts at Recovering Journalist who focuses on newspapers and Michael Rosenblum who has written extensively about what television news operations - both local and national - need to do.

I’m an optimist.  I don’t doubt that there will be a period of about 5-7 years after this region’s newspapers finally fold that things will get pretty bad.  Corruption, greed, malfeasance of all kind from government, business and crime bosses will make life pretty miserable for a while.  But as residents of this region get shaken out of their comfort zone and start to really hunt for information - news - about what’s going on with their government or with major economic powerhouses, others will step in to fill the void.  Such operations will be small, lean, web-based and intensely focused initially and they will require this population to be a little more connected than they are at present.  But over time they will mature and bring local news to a point where it is relevant, fascinating, useful and - most importantly - empowering.

And they will figure out how to make enough money to sustain themselves so we’re not in this situation for again for a long time, if ever.

Ok.  So what’s your vision for the future of local news?  Discuss in the comments.

1 Response to First they came for the newspapers…

  1. MB

    I think it’s worth acknowledging that local news has not been good for a long time. I realized that I haven’t watched local tv news for 10 yrs–I stopped watching when the stations increasingly tied “news” stories in with plot lines of the dramas/sitcoms that aired prior to broadcast. Also, local tv news fostered the diaspora of city residents to the suburbs by featuring city crime/violence at a level disproportionate to the city’s crime problem as a whole. So I do not miss the tv news at all, although I’m very sorry to hear about Gary Papas’ illness.

    And while I miss the good Inquirer, the fact is the city and the state were corrupt even during the years that the paper covered/uncovered it well. So we definitely have a problem here but I have no solutions. The internet will fill a type of void but the fact of internet-based information is that it only reaches people with internet access. I’m a bored office-based worker with the internet in my face all day, but many people barely see the internet even if they have access at home (parents with small children, for example). There was a story a few years ago about an event at Berkeley that caused an evacuation, or something (was it 9/11?), and the university used the internet to inform people that they had to go home (or something, I don’t remember exactly what happened) but the message did not reach the workers who were not desk-based. So the maintenance workers and all the people who had jobs outside had no idea what was going on. The university just assumed it was reaching everyone electronically but they missed an important part of the population. And that’s what may already be happening now (have you tried to watch tv without cable lately?). It’s weird because in many ways there is an overload of information with a scarcity of good info in other ways.

    So I’m very upset about the Inquirer and the Daily News. Sometimes I worry about WHYY but then another fundraiser comes along and my irritation with the pledge drives exceeds my concerns about the station. So the issue of revenue streams is really what this media meltdown is all about. Journalists used to follow the money but now they need to fix the money. That’s the issue. The rest is wasted opportunity.

spacer image