Bring this blog into the sewers
Friday, January 30th, 2009 at 2:46 pm - by Dan Pohlig. Filed under: Planning.
Yesterday I wrote about the controversy caused by the Philadelphia Water Department’s proposal to tear up Pine Street to replace old and inadequate stormwater/wastewater lines. The section of Pine Street under discussion includes Antique Row, the quaint little strip of antique and specialty stores from about 9th Street to 12th Street.
In the course of that post I mentioned how the Water Department has made plans in other parts of the city to relieve the pressure on the combined storm/waste water system by building large holding tanks that keep the water from backing up into basements or being discharged directly into rivers and streams during large rain storms. It’s a controversial plan that worries residents who live near the proposed sites for these tanks for a number of reasons - the disruption caused by the installation, the effect on the view and, of course, the smell.
A colleague here at WHYY read that post yesterday and informed me that folks out in the suburbs are having similar difficulties, both with the basement and backyard flooding and the plans to fix it:
I thought you might find it interesting that the Bucks County Water & Sewer Authority (BCWCA) recently managed to get its proposed open top tank approved over community opposition in Bensalem. I have included links to articles in the Bucks County Courier Times on the subject. Flooding and storm water runoff have been a problem in Bensalem for years, and the issue raised in the NE Times article of improper hook ups has been of particular concern, as the BCWCA actually enters the homes of residents in flood prone areas to inspect sump pumps. If they are connected to the sewer line, homeowners must either detach them, or redirect the flow to their yards, which, of course, regularly flood due to a lack of a proper storm water management plan when the homes were originally built.
As a city resident, I have a few reactions to this. One is that the this governmental agency, the BCWCA has its act together enough that it actually, well, enforces the rules. A major complaint in Philadelphia has been about the lack of oversight and enforcement of code violations by agencies like L&I and the Health Department. Of course, they’re responsible for a much larger area and many more people and businesses so such a comparison would only be fair if we determine how much, per capita, is spent on enforcement. If, as I suspect might be the case, Philadelphia funds its code enforcement agencies much less relative to the suburbs, then it’s a little more understandable.
To balance out that general complaint about the city’s enforcement issues, it looks like Philadelphians have it over their suburban counterparts when it comes to getting their elected officials to hold off on plans they don’t agree with. As you recall, the point of my reference to the holding tanks was to show how Northeast Philly residents, working through Councilman O’Neill, were able to block the installation of that holding tank. The account of Bensalem’s “open top” tank makes it clear that neighbor protest was ineffective. So, whether you agree or not that such a tank would have been a good idea in Northeast Philly, you have to admit that they have some sway up there.
Finally, the last point: “regularly flood due to a lack of a proper storm water management plan when the homes were originally built.” Many of these houses, and many of Philadelphia suburbs, were built in the time when the rush out of the city rivaled the Oklahoma Land Rush of 1889. They were built with little regard to things like zoning, planning and storm water management. Most were also built when the automobile was in its ascendancy. It was a time before “sustainability” was a common part of our civic vocabulary. That myopia is our sprawling legacy today.
Thanks to one of our regular readers for that tip. Anyone else in the ‘burbs or even in other neighborhoods of Philadelphia having issues that could be connected to the shortsightedness past generations or the sheer age of our infrastructure. Drop me a line and let me know your story.
It's Our City is a project that uses TV, Radio and Web
to promote civic engagement in the Philadelphia region.

February 20th, 2009 at 2:48 pm
Below is a letter I sent today to the Water Dept.’s coordinator for the Pine Street Flood Relief Project.
Dear Ms. Dahme,
I own the property at 1145 Pine St. and operate the bookstore there. I am very concerned about the effects of the Pine Street Storm Relief Project on my business, on my buildings (I also own 343 So 12th, which is adjacent to 1145 Pine), and on my neighborhood.
Judy Applebaum, President of the Wash. West Civic Assn., said I should ask you for the list of 42 properties whose flooding the Project is to relieve. There has been confusion on how many and where these properties are, so I was interested that Judy said they are all in Wash. West and none in Society Hill. The list will clear up a lot of mysteries and give me and others a better understanding of the problem.
I understand that people who have flooding are required by law to install a reflux valve (I think I am not using the correct term, but I hope you know what I mean). Is this so?
The property at 1145 Pine St. has bulging walls on the south and west. I am afraid that if the Water Dept. digs out the street to 16 feet, my 1880 building will collapse, perhaps bringing down 343 So. 12th with it. There must be dozens of other buildings along Pine in similar condition. If my property is damaged, who will pay for it?
My Pine St. building has a room underneath the Pine St. sidewalk. I think it was originally a coal room. Some years back the Streets Dept. broke through the ceiling of the room when they were working on the sidewalk. They didn’t know the room was there. I am hoping that this information reaches the right person, should the Project come to fruition.
As you know, this country is in an economic crisis. Everybody says the jobs of the future will be at small businesses. Pine Street from Broad to 7th has dozens of small businesses. These businesses are unique to Philadelphia, and so they contribute to the uniqueness of the city and provide reasons for people to like the city. The Project threatens the survival of each of these businesses. For two years people will know Pine St. is a mess, an area to be avoided. For two years the tour busses, which bring hundreds of visitors every day to our neighborhood thus exposing them to our unique offerings, will go elsewhere.
This store and I think many others in our neighborhood face stiff competition from the Internet behemoths. Making this store significantly less accessible and eliminating hundreds of parking spaces for months at a time will seriously threaten our ability to survive. If this store and others close, landlords will have trouble finding new tenants and property values, already under pressure, will sink further. Spending $15 million to replace the sewers may sound like a good investment, but I wonder if it is if it eliminates twice that much in economic activity and cancels the taxes that our businesses pay.
The Project seems poised to destroy an historic Philadelphia neighborhood. I hope the Water Dept.’s engineers will find a less drastic solution to the flooding.
Thank you for your attention,
Ed Hermance
June 14th, 2010 at 9:21 pm
That is well known that money can make people autonomous. But how to act if one doesn’t have money? The only one way is to receive the loans and just secured loan.